Hijack this

by Alli?dans the Gulf. With the risk to sap the culture of which d?nd them succ?au combat. Which is the mani? appropri?de addresses?ne Moslem woman. It is allowed to show the dishes of your feet in an Arab State. What happenhappens wounding tattooings. are taboos or not. And when one eats in a restaurant qatari, use you the left hand to take food, or the line. Whereas the world wonders when the war will start, certain US commanders try to make their troop culturally more open and less machist. Here some of the?neuses questions discut? by the male soldiers in and around the Gulf. Aboard ship of US Navy rassembl?dans the Gulf, the captains have d?ar?a war with wounding tattooings. Do Consid?tion for the others These d?ts go much further that the mani? of entra?r and to discipline the individual soldiers for the war to?enir in Iraq. And far from submerging of such d?ccords domestic by a great unifying mission, the attack planifi?sur Iraq put at the foreground. The cultural wars followed the Western forces in the Gulf. Does nothing of all that mean only the forces alli? do not go bient?d?encher their attack. As we saw these last months, there is a contrast striking between the h?tations policy?omicile and the d?nstrations of military power in the Gulf. But malgr?oute military power, d?ts on the nature of the ARM? betray a deep uncertainty on the mission of the Occident. In Qatar, the arm?am?caine learns?es soldiers?especter the Arab culture. "the doubts about the pr?nce am?caine persist [ in Qatar ]", brings back NBC News. The current US troops know the need for d?rmer Saddam, but one teaches them simultan?nt?especter the culture from people whom they could have to kill. For can a commander, the cultural opening?e appliqu?"m? in situation of combat ", for the treatment of the civil ones. Since the medium of the ann? 90, do the soldiers am?cains have?rgi their R? with-del?e coercion and conqu? by including/understanding?lement humane functions. A communiqu?e US Army affirms as follows: "To have, honor, country. Voil?es professional military values recognized for a long time and to which the new recruits must aspire. Add?r?nt another value of base: the consid?tion for the others. Is this culturally open life of soldier contrary to the mani? whose US troops?ient by the pass?r?r? with the combat. Can these sights propagandists of the enemies of Am?que have? wretched, but they have jou?n R? important for the soldiers. ARM? need?e pitiless, and d?umaniser the enemy has? a mani? traditional to inspire to the soldiers the caract? n?ssaire to advance and kill. Catch?a letter, this opening cultural could be potentially opposed?ne d?sive action. as the inspectors of UNO have it d?uvert?a at the end of January 2003. But it are heurt??a difficult?e to know if it?it acceptable or not to inspect mosqu?. A group of inspector has d?ench?ne tornado in Iraq when they have visit?a mosqu?Al-Nidaa?agdad, January 20, 2003. "It?it a visit priv?, d?ar?n spokesman troubl?e UNO, "they has wanted just to visit a mosqu? It is not only the cultural relation of the soldiers am?cains with their opponents which is remani?. it goes m from there? with their relations one with the other. US Army is engag??radiquer the sexism, racism and the homophobie in cr?t a "climate of respect" in the unit?militaires. In phase with this movement, the boats of US Navy which currently wait the war in the Persian Gulf have S? against wounding tattooings. The US forces are cr?un potential administrative nightmare by?ttant confused r?es on the acceptable type of tattooing or not according to services'. The forces am?caines are cr?un potential administrative nightmare by?ttant confused r?es on the acceptable type of tattooing or not according to services'. In the Air Force, the soldiers who have D? doubtful tattooings are autoris??es to preserve. as a long time as they are "neither excessive, nor wounding". There is more than appearances derri? the r?ession of the Navy. This one affirms that no tattooing would owe appara?e with the public when the sailors are in uniform. Of fate that m? a tattooing sexist on the derri? of a sailor, cach? by a pl?e or seldom seen by others would be prohibited. But for does the soldiers, to carry tattooings have? since many ann? a mani? to nourish a direction of solidarit?vec their comrades. According to a doctor of US Navy, "certain marine young people, aviators, soldiers and Marine consid?nt a visit with the living room of tattooing like a rite of passage. For much, a tattooing on their flesh is a durable memory of the friendship which they have once partag?. The offensive of the Navy against wounding tattooings can only corrode this direction of friendship. Now, tattooings will be consid?s with suspicion, the motivations of the sailor armadillo in question and can -?e prone?es enqu?s interns. There is then the probl? apparently major to register messages homophobes on bombs. But?a continuation of an unhappy incident during the war in Afghanistan, the messages of the bombs could have?e nettoy?pour the war of the Gulf to?enir. The awaited victims are tr?peu probably p?s.". Does the Navy have r?ndu by expressing a "official d?pprobation" of the message on the bomb, admitting that it?it "inappropri? We have pass?e word?os commanders so that they say, ' that does not correspond?os standard, the guy ". Pietrapaoli continued: "the essence of what is?it [ on the bombs ] is things like FDNY or I [ c.ur ] NY. That conforms more to the pattern of we want to do. We want that the messages remain positive ". Whose job is of d?uire and to kill. Nothing illustrates better the foss?ntre the military power of Am?que and its deep uncertainty that the incident of the message on the bomb. There is in Forces ARM? US a s?euse contradiction in the treatment of the personal relations of its soldiers. Of C?, the US commanders use the proximit?es troops and their direction of the solidarit?omme a means of leading them?e to beat. Of course, "not to give up anybody" always has? a central principle of the military op?tions. but does that never have? an aim in itself. To concentrate on this principle for him-m? pr?me D? the d?ite or reprocesses it, or the need to be extracted promptly from some share. And for which reason to intervene in first place. An officer sup?or has r?m?e probl?.: "With the type of recruits which we have today, we cannot push them too far. Original text: Brendan O' Neill, "GULF War meets War Culture". Translation and r?riture: Maj EMG Ludovic Monnerat to deepen your r?exions, the following books are conseill?War and American Popular Culture Reproduction of extracts with mention of the source and the author